◈ ProphetMapAI Chain Signal Radar
open source · MIT
Four-Dimension Funnel
2026-09-17 · Pass criteria: defensibility (physicalConstraint ≥ 4 OR moatCapture ≥ 4) · aiContribution ≥ 30% · timeToRealize ≠ far · pricingScore hysteresis (enter ≤ 2.8, exit > 3.2) · Moat ⚠ = supplier-trap (≤ 2)
Phys carries a constraint-type tag — tech decays on a technology roadmap, geo is rented from a jurisdiction and decays exogenously (policy, permitting, new capacity), reg is licence/liability, ? means the score has no physical referent. Zero weight — no gate reads it.
Real. = expectation-vs-delivery: 90d revision of +1y consensus EPS, and beats over the last four reported quarters. Every other column is forward-looking; this one is not. Also zero weight.
● FUNNEL PASS — 23 tickers
#SymbolLayerPhysMoatAI%Real.TimePricingPriceMkt CapAnalyst↑P/E note
#1CRHL9
4
geo
3
2
32%
-2.7%2/4 beat
MID1.4$86.72$58B+55.5%PE 13 vs 25.6
#2NVDAL2
5
tech
5
4
85%
+23.7%4/4 beat
NEAR2.0$219.62$5303B+49.6%PE 14 vs 31.9
#3SNPSL3
5
tech
5
2
40%
+1.7%4/4 beat
NEAR2.0$380.33$73B+43.5%PE 22 vs 29.6
#4AMKRL5
4
tech
2
2
35%
+14.5%4/4 beat
MID2.1$48.47$12B+57.6%PE 17 vs 19.2
#5TTMIL5_5
4
tech
3
2
30%
+27.6%4/4 beat
NEAR2.2$115.07$12B+86.2%PE 17 vs 22
#6AVGOL2_5
4
tech
4
3
55%
-0.2%4/4 beat
NEAR2.3$348.69$1664B+52.5%PE 18 vs 23.4
#7CDNSL3
5
tech
5
2
40%
+1.7%4/4 beat
NEAR2.4$279.57$77B+43.8%PE 29 vs 29.6
#8AMATL4
5
tech
4
2
30%
+13.2%4/4 beat
NEAR2.4$417.22$331B+53.6%PE 23 vs 23.7
#9QCOML2_5
3
4
2
45%
-4.3%3/4 beat
MID2.5$189.38$202B+2.5%PE 19 vs 23.4
#10AVAVL_DEF
4
reg
4
3
65%
-17.5%2/5 beat
NEAR2.5$164.16$8B+33.6%PE 37 vs 29.6
#11KTOSL_DEF
4
reg
4
4
70%
+2.3%4/4 beat
MID2.5$47.92$9B+114.4%PE 44 vs 29.6
#12GOOGL1
2
4
3
55%
+2.7%4/4 beat
NEAR2.6$342.05$4183B+23.5%PE 23 vs 25.9
#13COHRL8_OPT
4
tech
3
3
55%
+11.5%4/4 beat
MID2.6$293.07$57B+41.7%PE 21 vs 21.4
#14CRDOL2_5
4
tech
3
4
85%
+11.7%4/4 beat
NEAR2.6$165.91$31B+70.3%PE 17 vs 23.4
#15LINL3_5
5
geo
4
2
40%
-0.9%4/4 beat
NEAR2.7$457.68$211B+18.9%PE 23 vs 23.8
#16LRCXL4
5
tech
4
2
30%
+18.9%4/4 beat
NEAR2.7$269.37$337B+38.5%PE 23 vs 23.7
#17METAL0
2
4
3
50%
-3%2/4 beat
NEAR2.8$678.06$1727B+11.4%PE 19 vs 20.3
#18KLACL4
5
tech
4
2
35%
+11.7%4/4 beat
NEAR2.8$168.87$221B+38.4%PE 25 vs 23.7
#19TERL4
4
tech
3
2
40%
+23%4/4 beat
NEAR2.9$355.60$56B+25.6%PE 31 vs 23.7
#20CIFRL9_MINER_CONVERT
5
geo
3
2
45%
-67.7%1/4 beat
NEAR2.9$17.23$7B+84.5%PE 79 vs 99.1
#21TSML5
5
tech
5
3
50%
+11.5%4/4 beat
NEAR3.0$429.95$2230B+28.4%PE 20 vs 19.2
#22APLDL9_MINER_CONVERT
5
geo
3
3
55%
NM ↑4/4 beat
NEAR3.0$26.61$8B+171.3%PE -105 vs 99.1
#23LINKL_DCOMP
4
4
2
35%
NEAR2.4$11.36$8B
◌ NEAR MISS — PC ≥ 3, pricing ≤ 3.5 (watchlist candidates)
#SymbolLayerPhysMoatAI%Real.TimePricingPriceMkt CapAnalyst↑P/E note
#1AAL14
3
2
1
10%
-22.6%2/4 beat
FAR1.6$47.22$12B+33.4%PE 8 vs 14.9
#2CMIL12
3
3
2
35%
+5.7%0/4 beat
NEAR1.8$525.60$72B+44.0%PE 15 vs 26.2
#3VSTL11
3
3
1
20%
-5%1/4 beat
MID1.8$143.79$48B+51.3%PE 14 vs 16.8
#4MKSIL3_5
3
3
2
35%
+18.1%4/4 beat
MID1.9$239.96$16B+71.2%PE 14 vs 23.8
#5RNDRL_DCOMP
3
2
3
65%
NEAR1.9$1.42$1B
#6ORCLL0
1
3
2
35%
+0.7%4/4 beat
NEAR2.1$149.43$452B+59.9%PE 14 vs 20.3
#7SMCIL7
3
2
4
75%
+43.6%3/4 beat
NEAR2.2$40.63$27B+4.3%PE 8 vs 16.4
#8MODL8_COOL
3
2
4
70%
-3%4/4 beat
NEAR2.2$186.44$10B+66.4%PE 17 vs 18.4
#9CEGL11
4
geo
4
1
25%
-1.9%3/4 beat
MID2.3$263.44$93B+32.2%PE 20 vs 16.8
#10AMZNL0
1
3
2
40%
+5.1%3/4 beat
NEAR2.5$251.29$2710B+30.6%PE 24 vs 20.3
Near-miss criteria: (physicalConstraint ≥ 3 OR moatCapture ≥ 3) AND pricingScore ≤ 3.5. Not full passes — shown for monitoring.